So it’s been a while I know but I am kind of stirred up about this Terri Schiavo thing. It really upsets me that the liberal judges that are siding with her so called husband. These are the same judges that cry bloody uproar if an animal is suffering while it’s dying and the same liberals who say that a woman has a right to choose whether she wants to murder her unborn child.
So if you’re a wild animal its inhumane to let it suffer, or to give a dog a shock collar, or de-claw a cats front claws. But its humane to them to let a human being slowly starve to death. But on the other hand a woman has a right to choose whether she wants to murder her unborn child, doesn’t every one have the right to live? What would Terri choose?
Her unfaithful and faithless husband would have you believe that she wants to die and not be in her current state (a state she has been in since 1990 I believe). So if that was the case why did he not pull the plug then? Because it is an obvious farce that he made up because he currently has a mistress.
I saw just today that the pope is on a feeding tube now. Are the liberals going to say that he does not need it? I am going to say that even though I am not catholic and even though I think this pope is long past his time of “rule”, but that is still not a justified reason to stop feeding him through a tube.
Why is that, because conservatives like myself have core values that we stick to. The obvious value here is the sacredness of life. When a human is born a soul is born. It is not our place to determine who dies and who lives. It is our responsibility to preserve life, it is God’s responsibility to take life when He see’s fit.
So remember this when you vote for anyone; see how they value you life and where their voting record stands in regards to life. People voting democrat are going to be very shocked.